|
|
AGENDA
Audit and Risk Committee Meeting Friday, 25 February 2022
|
|
Date: |
Friday, 25 February 2022 |
Time: |
9.30 am |
Location: |
Microsoft Teams and Live Streamed
(Unless there is a move from the current Red Alert level, in which case it may be held at Nga Hāu e Whā, William Fraser Building, 1 Dunorling Street, Alexandra.
In both cases, due to COVID-19 restrictions and limitations of the physical space, public access will be available through a live stream of the meeting.
The link to the live stream will be available on the Central Otago District Council's website.)
|
Sanchia Jacobs Chief Executive Officer |
25 February 2022 |
Notice is hereby given that an Audit and Risk Committee meeting will be held via Microsoft Teams and live streamed on Friday, 25 February 2022 at 9.30 am. A link will be provided on the Central Otago District Council website.
Order Of Business
Audit and Risk Committee meeting Meeting - 3 December 2021
22.1.1 Declarations of Interest Register
22.1.2 Policy and Strategy Register
22.1.3 Audit and Risk Committee Terms of Reference.
22.1.4 External and Internal Audit Updates
22.1.5 Financial Report for the Period ending 31 December 2021
22.1.6 Cyber Security Plan 2018-2021 update
22.1.7 Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (LGOIMA) Request Policy
22.1.9 Health, Safety and Wellbeing Report
22.1.10 February 2022 Chair's Report
22.1.11 February Members' Reports
22.1.12 February Governance Report
10 Resolution to Exclude the Public
22.1.13 Wastewater Overflow Procedure review
22.1.14 Water Services Capital Projects Update
22.1.15 Strategic Risk Register
22.1.17 February 2022 Confidential Governance Report
Members Ms L Robertson (Chair), His Worship the Mayor T Cadogan, Cr N Gillespie, Cr S Jeffery, Cr N McKinlay
In Attendance S Jacobs (Chief Executive Officer), L Macdonald (Executive Manager - Corporate Services), J Muir (Executive Manager - Infrastructure Services), L van der Voort (Executive Manager - Planning and Environment), S Righarts (Chief Advisor), R Williams (Governance Manager) and W McEnteer (Governance Support Officer)
Audit and Risk Committee meeting - 3 December 2021
Audit and Risk Committee Agenda |
25 February 2022 |
MINUTES
OF Central Otago District Council
Audit and Risk
Committee HELD IN Ngā Hau e Whā, William Fraser Building,
1 Dunorling Street, Alexandra and
livestreamed on microsoft teams
ON Friday, 3 December
2021 AT 9.30
am
PRESENT: Ms L Robertson (Chair), His Worship the Mayor T Cadogan (via Microsoft Teams), Cr S Jeffery, Cr N McKinlay
IN ATTENDANCE: Cr I Cooney, S Jacobs (Chief Executive Officer), L Macdonald (Executive Manager - Corporate Services), J Muir (Executive Manager - Infrastructure Services), L Fleck (Executive Manager – People and Culture), G McFarlane (Business Risk and Procurement Manager), Q Penniall (Environmental Engineering Manager), I Evans (Water Services Manager), A McDowall (Finance Manager), A Crosbie (Senior Strategy Advisor), R Ennis (Health, Safety and Wellbeing Advisor) and R Williams (Governance Manager)
1 Apologies
Committee Resolution Moved: Robertson Seconded: McKinlay That the apology from Cr N Gillespie be received and accepted. Carried |
2 Public Forum
There was no public forum.
3 Confirmation of Minutes
Committee Resolution Moved: Robertson Seconded: McKinlay That the public minutes of the Audit and Risk Committee Meeting held on 1 October 2021 be confirmed as a true and correct record. Carried |
4 Declaration of Interest
Members were reminded of their obligations in respect of declaring any interests. There were no further declarations of interest. The Mayor noted two changes to his declaration.
5 Reports
21.4.2 Policy Register |
To consider the updated Policy and Strategy Register. The Committee requested that when due dates on the register changed, that this information was included on the register. |
Committee Resolution Moved: Robertson Seconded: McKinlay That the report be received. Carried |
21.4.3 Risk Register |
To consider an update on the Risk Register. It was noted that the table included with the agenda was still in a work in progress and a further update would be provided at the February meeting. The committee complimented the work to date and suggested that in addition to the register presented a more high level dashboard document be developed. |
Committee Resolution Moved: Robertson Seconded: McKinlay That the report be received. Carried |
21.4.4 The Staff Delegations Manual |
To receive the Staff Delegations Manual. |
Committee Resolution Moved: Robertson Seconded: McKinlay That the report be received. Carried |
21.4.5 Soft review of the Fraud, Bribery and Corruption Policy and the Protected Disclosures (Whistle Blower) Policy |
To consider the findings of the soft review of the Fraud, Bribery and Corruption Policy and the Protected Disclosures (Whistle Blower) Policy. During discussion a typographical error on fourth bullet point on page 4 of the Fraud, Bribery and Corruption Policy was noted, with the word “risk” to be deleted. The committee also agreed that a statement about possible staff disciplinary action, if an investigation is found to be substantive, would be added to the policy. |
Committee Resolution Moved: Robertson Seconded: McKinlay That the Audit and Risk Committee A. Receives the report. B. Recommends to Council that they approve the Fraud, Bribery and Corruption Policy with the amendments noted above. Carried |
Committee Resolution Moved: Robertson Seconded: McKinlay That the Audit and Risk Committee recommends to Council that they approve the Protected Disclosures (Whistle Blower) Policy. Carried |
21.4.6 Audit NZ and Internal Audit Update |
To consider an update on the status of the external and internal audit programme and any outstanding actions for completed internal and external audits. It was agreed that estimated completion dates for each action would be included in future updates. The Committee also requested for the internal audit plan to be included as a standing agenda item at each meeting. |
Committee Resolution Moved: Robertson Seconded: McKinlay That the report be received. Carried |
21.4.7 Financial Report for the period ending 30 September 2021 |
To consider the financial performance for the period ending 30 September 2021. |
Committee Resolution Moved: Robertson Seconded: McKinlay That the report be received. Carried |
21.4.8 Asset Management Policy |
To review and recommend to Council that they approve the 2021 Asset Management Policy. Corrections to the document were noted, and the words “for renewal and operational parts of the Long-term Plan” were added to the Council responsibility section of table two in the policy. |
Committee Resolution Moved: Robertson Seconded: McKinlay That the Audit and Risk Committee A. Receives the report. B. Recommends to Council that they approve the 2021 Asset Management Policy with the above amendment. Carried |
21.4.9 Infrastructure Construction Projects Update |
To consider monthly status reports for Clyde Wastewater and Lake Dunstan Water Supply projects and to provide an update on the implementation of project management software. Staff tabled and spoke to a “Summary Status Report Dashboard” document before responding to questions. |
Committee Resolution Moved: Robertson Seconded: McKinlay That the report be received. Carried |
21.4.10 Health, Safety and Wellbeing |
To provide with information on health, safety and wellbeing risks and controls at Central Otago District Council. The Chief Executive Officer provided an update on the organisation’s response and preparations under the COVID-19 protection framework. |
Committee Resolution Moved: Robertson Seconded: McKinlay That the report be received. Carried |
6 Chair's Report
21.4.11 December 2021 Chair's Report |
There was no Chair’s report. |
7 Members' Reports
21.4.12 December Members' Reports |
There were no members’ reports. |
8 Status Reports
21.4.13 December Governance Report |
To report on items of general interest, consider the Audit and Risk Committee’s forward work programme and the current status report updates. |
Committee Resolution Moved: Robertson Seconded: McKinlay That the report be received. Carried |
9 Date of The Next Meeting
The date of the next scheduled meeting is 25 February 2022.
10 Resolution to Exclude the Public
Committee Resolution Moved: Robertson Seconded: McKinlay That the public be excluded from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting. The general subject matter of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under section 48 of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution are as follows:
Carried |
The public were excluded at 11.25 am and the meeting closed at 12.06 pm.
|
22.1.1 Declarations of Interest Register
Doc ID: 567429
1. Purpose
Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other external interest they might have.
Appendix 1 - Declarations of Interest ⇩
|
22.1.2 Policy and Strategy Register
Doc ID: 567659
1. Purpose
To consider the updated Policy and Strategy Register.
That the report be received.
|
2. Discussion
The following updates were made to the register:
People and Culture
· Staff Interests Policy was reviewed with no changes suggested. A copy has been attached to this report.
Information Services
· Information and Records Management Policy updated.
Regulatory
· Dangerous and Insanitary Buildings Policy timeframes updated to align with the consultative process dates.
Roading
· Roading Policy was due for review in January 2022. This has been delayed to second quarter 2022 due to work prioritisation.
Libraries
· Three policies were due for review in late 2021, with two more policies due for review in early 2022. A review has commenced of these policies and it is anticipated these will be completed before the next Committee meeting.
General
· Asset Management Policy updated in January 2022.
Colour coding
At the last meeting, the Committee suggested colour coding on the register to clearly show when policies are overdue.
· Orange text has been added for policies overdue by less than six months.
· Red text has been added for policies overdue by six months or more.
Appendix 1 - Policy and Strategy Register ⇩
Appendix 2 - Staff Interest Policy ⇩
Report author: |
Reviewed and authorised by: |
|
|
Alix Crosbie |
Saskia Righarts |
Senior Strategy Advisor |
Chief Advisor |
8/02/2022 |
11/02/2022
|
|
22.1.3 Audit and Risk Committee Terms of Reference
Doc ID: 567439
1. Purpose of Report
To consider the terms of reference for the Audit and Risk Committee.
That the Audit and Risk Committee A. Receives the report and accepts the level of significance. B. Recommends to Council that they accept the proposed amendments to the Audit and Risk Committee’s terms of reference as detailed in appendix 2 of the report. C. Recommends to Council any additional changes (if applicable) to the Audit and Risk Committee’s terms of reference. |
2. Background
The Local Government Act 2002 (the Act) Schedule 7 Clause 32 states that for the purposes of efficiency and effectiveness a local authority may delegate to a committee or other subordinate decision-making body, community board, or member or officer of the local authority any of its responsibilities duties or powers unless expressly provided otherwise in the Act or any other Act.
At its inaugural meeting, held on 23 October 2019, the Central Otago District Council reconstituted the Audit and Risk Committee as a standing committee of Council. The terms of reference are attached as Appendix one.
Council will reconsider its committee structure and delegations following the 8 October 2022 local bodies election.
This report provides an opportunity for the Audit and Risk Committee to consider its terms of reference to present to the current Council in time to make recommendations for the incoming Council to consider.
3. Discussion
The Office of the Auditor General reenforced the importance of effective audit and risk committees for councils in its May 2019 report “Our 2018 work about Local Government.”
The report notes “audit and risk committees provide guidance and advice to councillors, typically on the council's financial reporting, risk management, system of internal controls, and external and internal audit matters.
Importantly, they can provide different and independent perspectives on the
risks, issues, and challenges councils face. Although audit and risk committees
should improve the governance of councils, they do not replace that
governance.”
The terms of reference for the Central Otago District Council’s Audit and Risk Committee reflects this.
Staff have suggested minor amendments, to reflect current practise and changes requested by the Committee in its currently term to date. These are attached as a tracked changes document at Appendix 2.
The Committee are asked to consider what, if any, other changes it would like to recommend to Council to consider.
4. Financial Considerations
There are no financial considerations as a consequence of this report. The independent chair is remunerated for their contribution, and this is included in existing budgets.
5. Options
Option 1 – (Recommended)
Endorse the proposed amendments to the Audit and Risk Committee’s terms of reference and suggest any further amendments for Council to consider.
Advantages:
· The Committee’s terms of reference will be updated and reflect current practise.
Disadvantages:
· There are no identified disadvantages to the recommended option.
Option 2
Do not update the Audit and Risk’s Committee’s terms of reference.
Advantages:
· There are no identified advantages to this option.
Disadvantages:
· The Committee’s terms of reference would remain unchanged and potentially out of date.
6. Compliance
Local Government Act 2002 Purpose Provisions |
This decision enables democratic local decision making and action by, and on behalf of communities by ensuring independent advice and guidance is offered by the Audit and Risk Committee on appropriate matters. |
Decision consistent with other Council plans and policies? Such as the District Plan, Economic Development Strategy etc. |
Yes, this decision will enhance the Council’s Delegation Register.
|
Considerations as to sustainability, the environment and climate change impacts |
There are no implications from this decision.
|
Risks Analysis |
There are no risks with the recommended option. |
Significance, Consultation and Engagement (internal and external) |
This is a procedural matter and, therefore, no external consultation or engagement is required.
|
7. Next Steps
Changes to the Audit and Risk Committee’s terms of reference will be forwarded to Council for its consideration. An updated Register of Delegations will then be presented to the incoming Council to consider at its inaugural meeting in October.
Appendix 1 - Audit and Risk Terms of Reference ⇩
Appendix 2 - Audit and Risk Terms of Reference with Tracked Changes ⇩
Report author: |
Reviewed and authorised by: |
|
|
Rebecca Williams |
Sanchia Jacobs |
Governance Manager |
Chief Executive Officer |
9/02/2022 |
18/02/2022
|
|
22.1.4 External and Internal Audit Updates
Doc ID: 563930
1. Purpose
To consider an update on the status of the external and internal audit programme and any outstanding actions for completed external and internal audits.
That the report be received.
|
2. Discussion
Council has a legislative requirement to complete external audits of annual reports and the Long-term Plan through Audit New Zealand. Audit New Zealand complete a governance report on their findings and any recommendations for improvements. A schedule of actions is then created and allocated to staff to manage the completion of these recommendations.
The 2020-2021 management report has yet to be received. Staff are expecting to receive this soon. However, Audit New Zealand are experiencing significant delays in their audit schedule due to a lack of staff which could result in further delays.
The 2019-2020 Audit New Zealand Management Report was presented to Audit and Risk at the June 2021 meeting. There were eight recommendations, of which four were already completed by June 2021. A fifth one was completed by December 2021, leaving three remaining. The Audit Action Register contains the three remaining actions, of which one is now closed, as there is a process in place to manage that particular recommendation. A further one has been completed but is pending Audit New Zealand’s sign off, and one remains outstanding, with the goal of it being completed by May 2022.
The 2018-2019 Audit New Zealand Management Report had six actions remaining as presented in previous Audit and Risk meetings. One has been completed in December 2021, two recommendations are not being implemented, and a third will either be closed off or remain a permanent ongoing action. The 3-waters recommendation remains in progress, as does the IT control environment recommendation. Both outstanding items have plans in place for completion.
In addition to external audits, Council also carries out several internal audits annually to provide assurance over compliance and to mitigate business risks. Two recommendations remain in progress in the payroll area, one is now completed, and one has been delayed. Training was scheduled for February 2022. But due to staff working in separate ‘bubbles’ due to COVID-19 and the threat of Omicron this training cannot take place until staff are able to fully interact with each other on a one-to-one basis. Dependant on the COVID-19 situation it is anticipated this should be completed by July 2022.
Appendix 1 and 2 list the outstanding tasks and any progress with these tasks. Once the Committee have viewed the completed tasks these are removed from the schedule.
The internal audit programme is reviewed every three years to provide assurance over compliance and to mitigate business risks. In August 2020, Deloitte’s recommended a four-year internal audit programme based on factors such as budgetary constraints, recently completed engagements and the current view of the risk landscape in the local government sector. This was then prioritised, and the Committee approved the programme of work as detailed below for the next four years (2021 – 2024) ending June 2024This programme will be reviewed in the December 2022 Audit and Risk Committee meeting, post the Council elections. This is to ensure this programme reflects the appropriate priorities, and to consider whether the remining items in red should be included in the next three-year programme.
The proposed audits, in the cyber security and procurement activities, are planned and scheduled to happen this financial year.
Internal Audit Review Programme |
FY 20-21 |
FY 21-22 |
FY 22-23 |
FY 23-24 |
Information and Records Management |
ü |
|
|
|
Procurement |
|
ü |
|
|
Cyber Security |
|
ü |
|
|
Contract Management |
|
|
ü |
|
Capital Expenditure Planning and Monitoring |
|
|
ü |
|
Health & Safety |
|
|
|
ü |
Recruitment Review |
|
|
|
ü |
Environmental Management (including Sustainability) |
|
|
|
|
Business Continuity / Disaster Recovery |
|
|
|
|
Asset Management |
|
|
|
|
Benefits Realisation |
|
|
|
|
Legislative Compliance |
|
|
|
|
Red – denotes suggested alternative audit review options
Appendix 1 - Audit New Zealand - Audit Action Register ⇩
Appendix 2 - Internal Audit Action Register ⇩
Report author: |
Reviewed and authorised by: |
|
|
Gabi McFarlane |
Leanne Macdonald |
Risk and Procurement Manager |
Executive Manager - Corporate Services |
21/12/2021 |
9/02/2022
|
|
22.1.5 Financial Report for the Period ending 31 December 2021
Doc ID: 566721
1. Purpose
To consider the financial performance for the period ending 31 December 2021.
That the report be received.
|
2. Discussion
The quarterly financial report is presented to the Committee as part of regular updates.
3. Financial Reporting
The operating variance for December 2021 year-to-date is ($3.551M) and is largely the result of Waka Kotahi subsidy, land sales and low operating expenditure.
Overall income has an unfavourable variance against the revised budget of ($5.54M). This relates to the timing of land sale revenue for the Dunstan Park subdivision and a parcel of Three Waters land. The budgeted timing for these activities is earlier than actual completed land sales. This will be adjusted in the forecast to align budgets with adjusted timelines for sales. Other factors include the timing of the roading Waka Kotahi and other grants.
· Land sales have not occurred within the budgeted timeframe. Part of this relates to land Council agreed to sell as part of the long-term planning process. All other land sales from subdivisions will come through later in the financial year when they are sold. The Dunstan Park subdivision sales will start showing in the January 2022 financials.
· Government grants and subsidies are lower than budget by ($799k). This is mainly due to the timing of the Waka Kotahi subsidy of ($968k). This subsidy moves in conjunction with the subsidised roading operating and capital work programmes. This is offset by $373k of Tourism Infrastructure funding for the new Clyde toilet and Miners Lane carparks. The budget for these activities is in User fees and other and will be re-aligned in the next revision of the budget.
· User fees and other has an unfavourable variance of ($578k). Of this variance, ($357k) is due to the grants budget being budgeted in ‘other income’ rather than the correct place of grants and subsidies. This budget includes the Tourism Infrastructure funding for the new Clyde toilet and Miners Lane carparks. This will be corrected in the next revision of the budget. Year-to-date revenue for this category is also down ($25k) in swimming pool admissions and ($132k) for water meter readings. The water meter readings result is believed to be timing and is expected to correct as the year progresses.
· Regulatory fees has a favourable variance of $410k. This variance continues to be driven by the timing of building consent revenue received, which year-to-date is $371k.
· Reserves contributions has a favourable variance of $171k. These contributions are dependent on developers’ timeframes and therefore difficult to gauge when setting budgets.
Expenditure is lower than budget by $1.996M. Operational expenditure is trending lower across all areas with no underlying variance of concern.
· Staff costs has a favourable variance of $381k. The is due in part to the lag between staff moving and the replacement of new staff, plus the relevant recruitment costs. It also includes staff training, made up of conferences and planned attendance at workshops, travel and accommodation. Delays are due to the on-going impact of COVID-19.
· Professional fees has a favourable variance of $437k. This is similar to contract expenditure where budget and actuals do not align throughout the year but typically align by the end of year. Major variances include: asset management plans and management costs ($75k); engineers fees $82k; management consultants $312k; planning consultants (review) $82k and recoverable professional fees ($130k). The asset management plans and management costs variance of ($75k) relates waste services contract that is currently under review.
· Depreciation has an unfavourable variance of ($219k). This is mainly due to a difference between the actual and budgeted wastewater depreciation. This is being investigated in more depth. It is likely due to the timing of project stages and carry forwards, which has impacted on the budget systems automation for calculating the depreciation. This will correct the Annual Plan 2022/23. Areas with major variances include: libraries ($31k); information services ($33k); parks reserves recreation $226k; property $38k; wastewater ($293k); and waste management ($42k). Wastewater is also reflecting the updated valuations which occurred after the Long-term Plan was approved.
· Refuse and recycling costs has a favourable variance of $168k. This is due to the timing of waste and recycling processing costs. These will fluctuate against the budget from time to time.
· Repairs and maintenance has a favourable variance of $100k. This is mainly due to the timing of various projects as well as building maintenance requirements.
· Loss of sale of asset has an unfavourable variance of ($262k). This is due to the disposal of District Rural Fire building assets to Fire and Emergency New Zealand (FENZ) as part of Council resolution 21.2.6 dated March 2021. This includes the Omakau Fire Depot and the Tarras Fire Station.
· Projects has a favourable variance of $130k. This is due to the phasing schedule of Tourism Central Otago projects.
· Other costs has a favourable variance of $257k. A detailed breakdown for other costs are in a table below the financial statement.
6 MONTHS ENDING 31 DECEMBER 2021 |
|
2021/22 |
||||
|
|
YTD |
YTD |
YTD |
|
|
Annual Plan |
|
Actual |
Revised Budget |
Variance |
|
Revised Budget |
$000 |
|
$000 |
$000 |
$000 |
|
$000 |
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
33,270 |
Rates |
17,141 |
17,093 |
48 |
|
33,270 |
7,248 |
Govt Grants & Subsidies |
7,911 |
8,710 |
(799) |
|
16,217 |
7,323 |
User Fees & Other |
3,112 |
3,690 |
(578) |
|
7,866 |
17,286 |
Land Sales |
- |
4,750 |
(4,750) |
|
14,650 |
2,155 |
Regulatory Fees |
1,585 |
1,175 |
410 |
|
2,155 |
2,104 |
Development Contributions |
1,063 |
1,052 |
11 |
|
2,104 |
388 |
Interest & Dividends |
45 |
194 |
(149) |
|
388 |
- |
Reserves Contributions |
171 |
- |
171 |
|
- |
55 |
Other Capital Contributions |
91 |
2 |
89 |
|
55 |
69,829 |
Total Income |
31,119 |
36,666 |
(5,547) |
|
76,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditure |
|
|
|
|
|
13,565 |
Staff |
6,362 |
6,743 |
381 |
|
13,529 |
587 |
Members Remuneration |
260 |
294 |
34 |
|
587 |
8,904 |
Contracts |
4,441 |
5,292 |
851 |
|
9,724 |
2,902 |
Professional Fees |
1,529 |
1,966 |
437 |
|
3,881 |
9,997 |
Depreciation |
5,218 |
4,999 |
(219) |
|
9,997 |
13,926 |
Costs of Sales |
2 |
100 |
98 |
|
7,290 |
3,920 |
Refuse & Recycling Costs |
1,550 |
1,718 |
168 |
|
3,920 |
1,723 |
Repairs & Maintenance |
763 |
863 |
100 |
|
1,739 |
1,410 |
Electricity & Fuel |
668 |
672 |
4 |
|
1,410 |
- |
Loss on Sale of Asset |
262 |
- |
(262) |
|
- |
652 |
Grants |
406 |
387 |
(19) |
|
652 |
1,115 |
Technology Costs |
503 |
562 |
59 |
|
1,099 |
303 |
Projects |
473 |
603 |
130 |
|
1,206 |
639 |
Rates Expense |
533 |
532 |
(1) |
|
634 |
423 |
Insurance |
448 |
423 |
(25) |
|
423 |
2,037 |
Other Costs |
759 |
1,016 |
257 |
|
2,041 |
62,103 |
Total Expenses |
24,174 |
26,170 |
1,996 |
|
58,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,726 |
Operating Surplus / (Deficit) |
6,945 |
10,496 |
(3,551) |
|
18,573 |
This table has rounding (+/- 1)
· Other costs have been configured to include only needs-based costs which will fluctuate against budget. There are no large variances of note to report on at present.
Other costs breakdown is as below:
2021/22 |
|
YTD Actual |
YTD Revised Budget |
YTD Variance |
2021/22 |
|
Annual Plan |
Other Costs breakdown |
Revised Budget |
||||
$000 |
|
$000 |
$000 |
$000 |
$000 |
|
535 |
Administrative Costs |
156 |
265 |
109 |
|
550 |
690 |
Office Expenses |
270 |
341 |
71 |
|
666 |
234 |
Operating Expenses |
109 |
126 |
17 |
|
234 |
327 |
Advertising |
111 |
154 |
43 |
|
329 |
175 |
Valuation Services |
86 |
88 |
2 |
|
175 |
76 |
Retail |
27 |
42 |
15 |
|
87 |
2,037 |
Total Other Costs |
759 |
1,016 |
257 |
|
2,041 |
This table has rounding (+/- 1)
Capital Expenditure
Capital expenditure is $13.543M against the year-to-date budget of $31.458M. Year-to-date, 44% of the initial 2021/22 Annual Plan has been expensed, however, when considering the revised annual plan, which includes carry-forwards and capital cost revisions, the year-to-date spend reduces to 21%. Below is a summary for each activity’s capital expenditure.
Due to supply chain and resource issues related to COVID-19, the capital works programme is behind the revised annual plan schedule. Staff plan to bring to Council in April 2022 the second budget revision for this financial year, assuming there is no significant impact from Omicron and its effect on staffing levels within Central Otago District Council.
Council Property and Facilities $4.M favourable against budget:
Cromwell Town Centre projects are driving most of this variance by $3.4M. The work programme is currently in the design phase for the Cromwell Memorial Hall and Events Centre. Next steps include site survey and concept design workshops being held in January 2022. The new Clyde toilets are progressing with the Lodge Lane toilets in operation. The Miners Lane toilets will not be operational until August 2022 when the Clyde wastewater reticulation system is complete. Other areas behind budget include airports $20k, council offices $281k and elderly person housing $150k.
Waste Management $577k favourable against budget:
The glass crushing plant project is behind budget by $47k. The transfer station reconfiguration projects are yet to start, contributing to $398k of the underspend.
Vehicle Fleet ($107k) unfavourable against budget:
Vehicle renewals and purchases are ahead of budget with 42% of the $256k total revised budget being already spent. The reforecast will re-align budgets with actuals.
Information Services $326k favourable against budget:
Information Services projects are behind budget. Projects include geographic information services $82k, enhanced customer experience digital services $19k, enterprise resource planning information services $150k and financial performance improvement $36k.
Parks and Recreation $1.18M favourable against budget:
This favourable variance is driven by a mixture of the timing of project budgets and contractor’s availability to perform the work. Projects include landscaping, signage and irrigation. The Cromwell pool replacement heat pump is on order and is due for delivery in February 2022 with preliminary fitting work to be carried out in December 2021. This accounts for half of the capital budget variance.
Roading $957k favourable against budget:
Roading projects are behind schedule and this is mainly due to the timing of the capital programme which tend to ramp up over the summer construction season. Projects include footpath renewals $70k, carpark renewals $224k, structures renewals $233k, sealed road renewals $558k.
Three Waters is $10.8M favourable against budget:
The favourable variance is due to the timing of construction projects. The main drivers include the Lake Dunstan water supply $4.2M, water treatment plant and capacity upgrades $2.6M, water supply renewals $791k and water stimulus fund projects $1.5M. The Clyde wastewater reticulation network construction is progressing well.
|
|
|
|
|
2021/22 |
Progress to date against revised budget |
|
Annual Plan |
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE |
YTD Actual |
YTD Revised Budget |
YTD Variance |
|
Revised Budget |
|
$000 |
|
$000 |
$000 |
$000 |
|
$000 |
|
6,058 |
Council Property and Facilities |
626 |
4,699 |
4,073 |
|
9,146 |
7% |
382 |
Waste Management |
336 |
913 |
577 |
|
913 |
37% |
- |
i-SITEs |
- |
4 |
4 |
|
4 |
0% |
50 |
Customer Services and Administration |
14 |
31 |
17 |
|
62 |
23% |
204 |
Vehicle Fleet |
107 |
- |
(107) |
|
256 |
42% |
248 |
Planning |
- |
35 |
35 |
|
348 |
0% |
352 |
Information Services |
129 |
455 |
326 |
|
1,386 |
9% |
164 |
Libraries |
57 |
93 |
36 |
|
512 |
11% |
1,713 |
Parks and Recreation |
505 |
1,685 |
1,180 |
|
3,755 |
13% |
7,420 |
Roading |
3,018 |
3,975 |
957 |
|
7,950 |
38% |
14,243 |
Three Waters |
8,751 |
19,568 |
10,817 |
|
38,726 |
23% |
30,834 |
Grand Total |
13,543 |
31,458 |
17,915 |
|
63,058 |
21% |
Statement of Financial Position
The Statement of Financial Position (Balance Sheet) is a new report which will be included in the reports to both Council and to the Audit and Risk Committee. It is included to show the comparisons between actuals and budget. Below the financial position is a table summarising the reserves and the cash balances. This gives assurance that there are available funds to meet the cash financial reserve balances typically included in Council’s set of financial reports.
2020/21 YTD December Actual |
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION |
2021/22 YTD* |
2021/22 Revised Budget |
2021/22 |
|
$000 |
$000 |
for the period ended 31 December 2021 |
$000 |
$000 |
$000 |
|
|
EQUITY |
|
|
|
392,456 |
382,902 |
Ratepayers equity |
404,206 |
414,890 |
393,593 |
12,321 |
8,492 |
Surplus/(Deficit) |
6,945 |
18,491 |
7,644 |
7,035 |
14,442 |
Council Reserves |
7,603 |
4,258 |
4,178 |
487,465 |
483,494 |
Property revaluation reserve |
487,393 |
496,629 |
496,629 |
(17) |
(20) |
Investment shares fair value revaluation reserve |
(17) |
(20) |
(20) |
80 |
80 |
Restricted reserves |
80 |
80 |
80 |
899,340 |
889,390 |
Total equity |
906,210 |
934,328 |
902,104 |
|
|
REPRESENTED BY: |
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
6,514 |
9,931 |
Cash and cash equivalents |
4,802 |
19,896 |
19,896 |
10,000 |
11,000 |
Other financial assets |
6,000 |
8,000 |
8,000 |
4,852 |
34 |
Receivables |
483 |
3,171 |
3,171 |
- |
- |
Non-Current assets held for sale |
- |
- |
- |
5,394 |
1,543 |
Inventories |
6,613 |
1,509 |
1,509 |
- |
- |
Investment Bond |
- |
625 |
625 |
26,760 |
22,508 |
Total current assets |
17,898 |
33,201 |
33,201 |
|
|
Less current liabilities |
|
|
|
256 |
295 |
Agency and deposits |
509 |
273 |
273 |
13,254 |
3,401 |
Payables and deferred revenue |
5,126 |
4,705 |
4,705 |
673 |
654 |
Employee entitlements |
777 |
1,010 |
1,010 |
- |
- |
Borrowings and other financial liabilities |
- |
- |
- |
14,183 |
4,350 |
Total current liabilities |
6,412 |
5,988 |
5,988 |
12,577 |
18,158 |
Working capital |
11,486 |
27,213 |
27,213 |
|
|
Non-current assets |
|
|
|
111 |
109 |
Available for sale financial assets |
111 |
109 |
109 |
282 |
317 |
Loans and receivables |
254 |
333 |
333 |
26,030 |
21,739 |
Work in Progress |
37,400 |
63,058 |
30,834 |
852,712 |
846,195 |
Property, plant and equipment |
849,328 |
864,309 |
864,309 |
1,272 |
845 |
Intangible assets |
1,275 |
2,271 |
2,271 |
431 |
355 |
Forestry assets |
431 |
357 |
357 |
5,925 |
1,675 |
Investment property |
5,925 |
1,683 |
1,683 |
886,763 |
871,235 |
Total non-current assets |
894,724 |
932,120 |
899,896 |
|
|
Less non-current liabilities |
|
|
|
- |
3 |
Provisions |
- |
5 |
5 |
- |
- |
Borrowings and other financial liabilities |
- |
25,000 |
25,000 |
- |
3 |
Total non-current liabilities |
- |
25,005 |
25,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
899,340 |
889,390 |
Net assets (assets minus liabilities) |
906,210 |
934,328 |
902,104 |
This table has rounding (+/- 1)
* year-to-date actual values are subject to change and are only indicative of the end of year totals.
The cash balance and its reconciliation to council cash-reserves, is to provide surety to council that the cash reserves are supported by cash in the bank. Timing is not always perfect due to accrual accounting and income revenue being received in advance. What this report demonstrates is that at 30 June 2021 Council had audited (cash) financial reserves of $7M, and $16.5M in actual cash in the bank. The reason for the significant variance is the cash received in advance for the new financial year.
Cash Balances |
Full Year Actuals |
YTD Actuals* as at |
|
30 June 2021 |
31 December 2021 |
|
$000 |
$000 |
Cash at Bank (cash and cash equivalents) |
6,514 |
4,802 |
Investments* (other financial assets) |
10,000 |
6,000 |
Total Cash Balances |
16,514 |
10,802 |
|
|
|
|
Actual Reserves |
YTD Reserves* |
Council Reserves |
30 June 2021 |
31 December 2021 |
District Reserves |
985 |
(2,314) |
District Targeted Reserves |
(17,674) |
(13,998) |
Vincent Community Board |
2,692 |
5,510 |
Cromwell Community Board |
18,903 |
19,333 |
Maniototo Community Board |
813 |
953 |
Teviot Valley Community Board |
1,317 |
1,121 |
Total Council Reserves |
7,035 |
10,604 |
|
|
|
Cash Variance to Reserves |
9,479 |
198 |
* Investments are broken down in point 5 of this report. |
|
|
Variance made up of the timing of Cash received in advance : |
||
Three-waters (Stimulus) |
4,200 |
|
STAPP |
365 |
|
Rates/Water |
500 |
|
Other |
1,500 |
|
|
6,565 |
|
|
|
|
Cash Variance to reserves |
2,914 |
198 |
This table has rounding (+/- 1)
* year-to-date actual values are subject to change and are only indicative of the end of year totals.
4. Accounts
Receivable
As at 31 December 2021, Council had $136k outstanding in accounts receivables greater than 90 days. Sundry debtors are the key contributors and include:
· Ministry of Business and Innovation $57.5k (grant funding for Welcoming Communities Programme). This has subsequently be paid in full.
· Top Shelf Productions $5.7k (agreement to fund people on Bikes Series 2)
· Hillview Winery Limited $5.9k (relating to rental Alexandra Airport)
· Ventia $6k (relating to fibre drilling repairs)
· Arawata Assets $5.9k (relating to rental of Tarbert St premise)
Resource consents include:
· Crom 1825 Limited $7.9k (development contribution fees)
· M N Shaw $8.5k (payment plan in place – balance to be paid by 30 June 2022)
Type of Debtor |
Current |
30 Days |
60 Days |
> 90 Days |
Other |
$ 47,655 |
$ 52,833 |
$ 16,663 |
$ 100,031 |
Building Consents |
$ 33,328 |
$ 14,175 |
$ 8,094 |
$ 8,141 |
Resource Consents |
$ 56,763 |
$ 31,810 |
$ 1,939 |
$ 28,010 |
TOTAL |
$ 137,746 |
$ 98,818 |
$ 26,697 |
$ 136,182 |
Type of Debtor |
December 2021 |
November 2021 |
October 2021 |
December 2020 |
Other |
$ 217,182 |
$ 101,490 |
$ 179,709 |
$ 168,450 |
Building Consents |
$ 63,739 |
$ 68,849 |
$ 46,259 |
$ 34,024 |
Resource Consents |
$ 118,522 |
$ 96,245 |
$ (37,342) |
$ 185,465 |
TOTAL |
$ 399,443 |
$ 266,585 |
$ 188,626 |
$ 387,939 |
Debt is actively managed and monitored and if a debtor is past our three-month threshold, their information is sent to our debt collection agency, Receivables Management Limited.
There is a credit balance of ($53k) in current month outstanding invoices in “under 500”. This relates to resource consent debtors where payment has been made in advance of the invoice.
5. Investment
As at 31 December 2021, council had cash balances of $10.8M, of which term deposits totalling $6M mature within 90 days.
Bank |
Amount |
Term (Month) |
Start Date |
End Date |
Fixed Rate |
KiwiBank |
2,000,000 |
1 |
10 Dec 2021 |
10 Jan 2022 |
0.40% |
KiwiBank |
4,000,000 |
3 |
10 Dec 2021 |
10 Mar 2022 |
1.00% |
Weighted average interest rates for all council term deposits is 0.80%.
6. Internal Loans
Forecast closing balance for 30 June 2022 is $4.075M.
OWED BY |
Original Loan |
1 July 2021 |
30 June 2022 Forecast |
Opening Balance |
Closing Balance |
||
Public Toilets |
670,000 |
491,239 |
468,048 |
Tarbert St Bldg |
25,868 |
13,067 |
11,574 |
Alex Town Centre |
94,420 |
49,759 |
44,545 |
Alex Town Centre |
186,398 |
91,041 |
79,921 |
Alex Town Centre |
290,600 |
155,412 |
139,137 |
Centennial Milkbar |
47,821 |
21,284 |
18,192 |
Vincent Grants |
95,000 |
19,000 |
9,500 |
Pioneer Store Naseby |
21,589 |
10,949 |
9,609 |
Water |
867,000 |
717,829 |
691,212 |
ANZ Bank Seismic Strengthening |
180,000 |
149,030 |
143,504 |
Molyneux Pool |
650,000 |
571,900 |
539,400 |
Maniototo Hospital |
1,873,000 |
1,775,142 |
1,723,630 |
Alexandra Airport |
218,000 |
204,485 |
197,216 |
Total |
5,219,695 |
4,270,138 |
4,075,488 |
7. External Community Loans
The total amount of external loans at the beginning of the financial year 2021-22 was $189k. As at 31 December 2021, the outstanding balance was $161k. Council has received $27k in principal payments and $4.9k in interest payments.
Owed By |
Original Loan |
1 July 2021 Opening Balance |
Principal |
Interest |
30 December 2021 |
Cromwell College |
400,000 |
130,770 |
17,451 |
3,607 |
113,318 |
Maniototo Curling |
160,000 |
35,662 |
6,790 |
821 |
28,872 |
Oturehua Water |
46,471 |
22,623 |
2,853 |
548 |
19,770 |
|
606,471 |
189,055 |
27,094 |
4,976 |
161,960 |
8. Reserve Funds table
· As at 30 June 2021 the Council has an audited closing reserve funds balance of $7.035M. This reflects the whole district’s reserves and factors in the district-wide reserves which are in deficit at ($16.7M). Refer to Appendix 1.
· Taking the 2020-21 audited Annual Report closing balance and adding 2021-22 income and expenditure, carry forwards and resolutions, the whole district is projected to end the 2021-22 financial year with a closing deficit of ($10.772M).
Appendix 1 - Reserves 2021_22 .pdf ⇩
Report author: |
Reviewed and authorised by: |
|
|
Ann McDowall |
Leanne Macdonald |
Finance Manager |
Executive Manager - Corporate Services |
10/02/2022 |
10/02/2022
|
|
22.1.6 Cyber Security Plan 2018-2021 update
Doc ID: 563929
1. Purpose
To consider an update on the 2018-2021 Cyber Security Plan.
That the report be received.
|
2. Discussion
In this report, the following topics will be covered:
· What’s happening in New Zealand?
· What’s happening at Central Otago District Council?
· Association of Local Government Information Management (ALGIM) Cyber Security Programme update
· Outstanding Key Recommendation Status Report (in the future, these key recommendations will be included in the ALGIM Cyber Security Programme update)
· Cyber Security programme of work
Executive Summary
Focus areas of cyber security since the last report have been on:
· User education, training, and awareness
· Protective technology improvements to maximise value
· Updating and reviewing actions related to the requirements and controls for the (ALGIM) Cyber Security Programme framework
What’s happening in New Zealand?
Council utilise Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT) as a resource for cyber security support. CERT NZ works to support businesses, organisations and individuals who are affected (or may be affected) by cyber security incidents. CERT provide trusted and authoritative information and advice, while also collating a profile of the threat landscape in New Zealand.
The following highlights quarter three 2021 cyber security incidents across New Zealand:
More details on the current threat landscape can be found here: Quarter Three Report 2021 | CERT NZ
What’s happening at Central Otago District Council?
Information Services is seeing a trend in technology platforms being targeted rather than people currently.
The following outlines what Council protective technologies are doing for the 4 January 2022 to 3 February 2022 period:
· Potentially unwanted applications (PUAs)
Managed Threat Response service over the last 30 days:
ALGIM Cyber Security Programme update
Association of Local Government Information Management (ALGIM) has defined a Cyber Security framework which is powered by Self-Assessment and Management System for Standards Compliance (SAM for Compliance) giving councils the ability to manage and reduce organisational Cyber Security related risk. As part of the programme, councils that demonstrate defined levels of achievement and improvement will receive awards at the ALGIM annual conference.
The latest Management Status Report is attached for your information (Appendix 1).
The following details the current snapshot of how Council is preforming within this framework benchmarked against other councils:
· The following shows that Council is 77.32% compliant with the framework controls:
· The following shows how Council is tracking against other councils within this framework over the last 12 months:
· The following is a summary of the controls by status:
Regularly review of the
framework occurs once a month, updating controls and working on outstanding
actions and improvements.
The following is summary of the improvements within each function:
Identify:
· Asset Management – Procedures have been finalised and changes to processes are being implemented.
· Governance – Policy and procedures are finalised and up to date. Digital and Information Strategy is due to be finalised June 2022, which will include Cyber Security.
· Risk Assessment and Management – Forms part of the Information Services Activity Management Plan, which has recently been reviewed. Cyber security risks are identified, and mitigations are being implemented and monitored.
Manage:
· Access Control – Planned physical security work has been delayed due to COVID-19. Work on remote access agreements with contractors is being progressed.
· Information and Data Security – USB portable drives access restriction testing is progressing; exemptions are yet to be agreed.
· Information Protection Procedures and Processes – Procedures have been finalised and changes to processes are being implemented.
· Maintenance – Annual review of maintenance has occurred, with changes being implemented.
Protect:
· Awareness and Training – this is currently the focus in the organisation, with Phriendly Phishing virtual training, reporting and staff education ongoing. Onsite specialist training has been delayed due to COVID-19.
· Protective Technology – After the core functionally was initially deployed and bedded in, improvements to maximise its value are being investigated and deployed to further meet Council policies and standards.
Detect:
· Anomalies and Events – Events Management Procedure is in progress to formalise and improve current processes.
· Continuous Monitoring – Investigation into enhanced continuous monitoring technologies is being progressed.
Respond:
· Review of the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Disaster Recovery Plan is underway due to the renewal of server infrastructure. This renewal has provided improved business continuity and recovery options. Testing of this updated plan will confirm Information Services ability to respond and meet the business continuity requirements of council.
Recover:
· ICT Disaster Recovery Plan is underway as the renewal project for server, storage, backup, and recovery systems is coming to an end. This environment has been replaced following a successful tender bid from The Information Management Group (TIMG). TIMG are providing the following:
o Infrastructure as a Services (IaaS) – Fully managed service that will reside in the Alexandra server room.
o Back-up as a Service (BaaS) – Fully managed service that will reside in the TIMG Auckland datacentre. This will provide all councils back-up requirements, including backing up critical cloud services such as Microsoft 365 and MAGIQ Cloud in the future.
o Disaster Recovery as a Service (DRaaS) – Fully managed service that will reside in the TIMG Auckland datacentre. This will provide an improved recovery solution with geographical resilience and improved recovery times.
· In addition to the ICT Disaster Recovery Plan being updated, the Back-up and Recovery Procedure is being updated taking into account the new service. This service and procedure enable Council recover from minor data loss through recovering from a major event.
The following shows how Council is tracking by each function within the framework when compared to other councils:
The following shows the trend by each function over the last 12 months. Recover and respond have not been the focus, as council’s ability to respond is well established. Improvements has been made within manage, protect, and detect due to work around protective technologies and staff awareness and education.
Outstanding Key Recommendation Status Report
Following the Cyber Security Audit in 2019 key recommendations were made. There are no outstanding key recommendations.
Cyber Security programme of work
The Cyber Security Plan has been supported by Cyber Security programme of work. The current programme is nearing completion, which will be replaced by a new programme initiated by the new cyber security plan.
New Cyber Security Plan
This project is currently scheduled for first half of 2022, following the Cyber Security Audit.
Information Services Service Management procedures
These are Information Services primary service management procedures, which have a relationship with the Protection of Information and Information Systems policy and standard series:
· Asset Management Procedure
· Change Management Procedure
· Incident and Problem Management Procedure, this includes the sub process of critical incident management, which includes incident reporting
· Knowledge Management Procedure
· Preventative Maintenance Management Procedure
· Project Management Procedure
· Service Desk and Services Management Procedure
These procedures have now been finalised and iterative changes will be made as these practices mature over the coming 12 months.
Appendix 1 - Management Status Report ⇩
Report author: |
Reviewed and authorised by: |
|
|
Nathan McLeod |
Leanne Macdonald |
IS Manager |
Executive Manager - Corporate Services |
17/01/2022 |
8/02/2022
|
|
22.1.7 Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (LGOIMA) Request Policy
Doc ID: 563954
1. Purpose of Report
To review and recommend the Chief Executive approves the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (LGOIMA) Request Policy, which is related to Council granting requests for information under the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987.
That the Audit and Risk Committee A. Receives the report and accepts the level of significance. B. Recommends the Chief Executive approves this policy and issues to staff for implementation. |
2. Background
Members of the public are entitled to request various information from council. The Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 provides the legislative framework for how to respond to such requests. This legislation details key considerations such as timelines and any limits on the provision of requested information. Council does not currently have a policy relating to granting access to information. Council’s current procedures for LGOIMA requests follow those as prescribed in legislation.
3. Discussion
The Ombudsman’s LGOIMA assessment framework recommends Council adopt policy to support Council granting the release of information. As such, to complete council’s current procedures a formal policy has been prepared.
Following research and consultation, the attached policy has been prepared.
4. Financial Considerations
No financial impact.
5. Options
Option 1 – (Recommended)
The Committee recommends the Chief Executive approves the LGOIMA Request Policy.
Advantages:
· Provides requesters of information guidance on the LGOIMA Request process
· Protects Council’s reputation
· Reinforces Council’s approach to requesting information
· Generates awareness of information availability
Disadvantages:
· None
Option 2
The Committee recommends the Chief Executive does not approve the LGOIMA Request Policy.
Advantages:
· None
Disadvantages:
· Lack of guidance on requesting information
· Not meeting the Ombudsman recommendations
6. Compliance
Local Government Act 2002 Purpose Provisions |
This decision ensures the organisation conducts business in an open, transparent, and democratically accountable manner. |
Decision consistent with other Council plans and policies? Such as the District Plan, Economic Development Strategy etc. |
The Policy maintains consistency with other Council policies and processes.
|
Considerations as to sustainability, the environment and climate change impacts |
There are no implications. |
Risks Analysis |
This new policy supports best practice and mitigates financial and reputational risk by supporting Council granting release of information.
|
Significance, Consultation and Engagement (internal and external) |
The policy is not significant and are therefore unlikely to generate community or media interest.
No consultation is required as this is not deemed significant under the Significance and Engagement Policy. |
7. Next Steps
Once approved by the Chief Executive, the Council website will be updated, and staff will be notified of the policy through the Council intranet.
Appendix 1 - LGOIMA Request Policy ⇩
Report author: |
Reviewed and authorised by: |
|
|
Nathan McLeod |
Leanne Macdonald |
IS Manager |
Executive Manager - Corporate Services |
17/01/2022 |
8/02/2022
|
|
Doc ID: 563994
1. Purpose of Report
To review and recommend the Chief Executive approves the Privacy Policy for council staff use, which is related to Council’s code of practice and legal obligations in accordance with the Privacy Act 2020.
That the Audit and Risk Committee A. Receives the report and accepts the level of significance. B. Recommends the Chief Executive approves this policy and issues to staff for implementation. |
2. Background
Council’s current privacy policy is a statement on the council website. To strengthen council’s commitment to privacy and the use of personal information a new privacy policy is being recommended.
3. Discussion
Central Otago District Council’s customers need to have trust and confidence in the way council manages their personal information.
Council collects large volumes of complex personal information, utilised by various procedures across council for the purpose that personal information was collected. The current privacy statement is not suitable for this level of complexity.
The proposed new privacy policy forms part of Council Privacy Plan programme of work, which ensures Council is adhering to the Information Privacy Principles, surrounding the collection and dissemination of personal information, managing privacy risks, breach notifications, privacy complaints, requests for personal information and update, and the protection of individuals.
Following research and consultation, the attached policy has been prepared.
4. Financial Considerations
No financial impact.
5. Options
Option 1 – (Recommended)
The Committee recommends the Chief Executive approves the Privacy Policy.
Advantages:
· Provides customers with trust and confidence that council manages their personal information appropriately
· Protects council’s reputation
· Reinforces council’s approach to managing personal information
· Generates awareness of personal information management
Disadvantages:
· None
Option 2
The Committee recommends the Chief Executive does not approve the Privacy Policy.
Advantages:
· None
Disadvantages:
· Lack of guidance on personal information management
· Does not meet council’s requirements for dealing with complex personal information
6. Compliance
Local Government Act 2002 Purpose Provisions |
This decision ensures the organisation conducts business in an open, transparent, and democratically accountable manner. |
Decision consistent with other Council plans and policies? Such as the District Plan, Economic Development Strategy etc. |
The Policy maintains consistency with other Council policies and processes.
|
Considerations as to sustainability, the environment and climate change impacts |
There are no implications. |
Risks Analysis |
This new policy supports best practice and mitigates financial and reputational risk by enabling robust personal information management. |
Significance, Consultation and Engagement (internal and external) |
The policy is not significant and are therefore unlikely to generate community or media interest.
No consultation is required as this is not deemed significant under the Significance and Engagement Policy. |
7. Next Steps
Once approved by the Chief Executive, the Council website will be updated, and staff will be notified of the policy through the Council intranet.
Appendix 1 - Privacy Policy ⇩
Report author: |
Reviewed and authorised by: |
|
|
Nathan McLeod |
Leanne Macdonald |
IS Manager |
Executive Manager - Corporate Services |
17/01/2022 |
8/02/2022
|
|
22.1.9 Health, Safety and Wellbeing Report
Doc ID: 566834
1. Purpose
To provide with information on health, safety and wellbeing risks and controls at Central Otago District Council.
That the report be received.
|
2. Discussion
2.1 Covid-19
2.1.1 Covid-19 Vaccination Policy
On Friday December 20, 2021, the Chief Executive Officer approved the COVID-19 Vaccination Policy.
This policy required all staff to have received their first vaccination for COVID-19 by January 5, 2022.
2.1.2 Working from home rotations
On Monday January 31, 2022, council moved to a three-bubble working model. Working bubbles are intended to support business continuity during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The bubbles minimise the contact between workers while allowing council to continue to deliver its full range of services.
In council offices, bubbles work on a fortnightly rotation between their home and council workplaces, with one bubble working fully from the office in an area isolated from the other two bubbles. This rotation allows for inspections (for example building inspectors) to continue as usual.
Customer service in the service centre is open as usual with teams in a fortnightly rotation.
Other service areas (for example, libraries and pools) are also open. Employees in these areas have been grouped as closely as possible to a two-bubble system.
As part of this decision, council requires external meetings to be held online or offsite, as appropriate.
2.2 Contractor management
Four contractors improved their score from green to gold during the last reporting period. The average contractor score improved from 88% to 89%.
Fig 1. Sitewise scores at February 1, 2022
Major contractors Delta and Fulton Hogan have provided their updated COVID-19 management plans for red light.
No incidents involving contractors were raised to council during the reporting period October to December 2021.
2.3 Health and safety reporting
There were 143 reports made in 2021.
Report status |
Reported |
Reviewer |
Outstanding actions |
Closed |
|
0 |
0 |
2 |
143 |
2.3.1 Worker reports
From October to December 2021, Health and Safety focused on promoting proactive reporting of health and safety concerns.
75% of incident reports filed by employees during 2021 were proactive reports. Proactive reports include observations, near misses/exposures and unsafe behaviours.
Proactive reporting allows the People and Culture team to provide early intervention and prevention to employees to ensure that the reports do not escalate to injury or illness.
2.3.1a Worker injuries
There were eight recordable injuries during the reporting period October-December 2021.
Two lost time injuries (LTIs) occurred during this period accounting for 24 lost work hours.
In 2021, there were 80 work hours lost to injury.
Reporting period |
Non-treatment injury |
FAI |
LTI |
MTI |
Fatality |
Total recordable injuries |
July-Sept 21 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
Oct-Dec 21 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
2.3.1b Lost time injury rate
At the December 3, 2021, meeting of the Audit and Risk Committee, the question was raised about what an acceptable rate of lost time injury might look like.
According to the Business Leaders’ Health and Safety Forum Benchmark Report 2020, the New Zealand national average for LTIs is 1.99 injuries per 200,000 hours of work. This average includes data from a range of industries, including local government.
In 2021, council had a 12-month average LTI of 2.27 (accounting for 3 injuries).
From the next report, this rate will be presented as a rolling average.
Chart 1: Average lost time injury rate in 2021 compared with national average for 2020
Month |
Average LTIR (YTD) |
Number of injuries |
January 2021 |
0 |
0 |
February 2021 |
0 |
0 |
March 2021 |
0 |
0 |
April 2021 |
0 |
0 |
May 2021 |
0 |
0 |
June 2021 |
1.66 |
1 |
July 2021 |
1.39 |
0 |
August 2021 |
1.19 |
0 |
September 2021 |
1.04 |
0 |
October 2021 |
1.85 |
1 |
November 2021 |
2.50 |
1 |
December 2021 |
2.27 |
0 |
2.3.1c ACC report
In 2021, council had the highest number of ACC claims made by employees in five years. However, council was more effective in minimising the amount of time spent away from work due to injury. Four of the ACC claims in 2021 did not require any time away from work.
Year |
No of claims |
2017 |
6 |
2018 |
5 |
2019 |
5 |
2020 |
3 |
2021 |
7 |
Council has a return-to-work process for employees who are away from work due to injury or ill-health, regardless of cause (work-related or private).
Before council accepts a work-related claim, the employee must have reported the incident. Incident reporting allows Health and Safety to provide early intervention and prevention options before the employee gets to the claim stage.
The number of claims over $500 and the number of compensation days are used to calculate the discount or loading (penalty) applied to our annual ACC levy.
At the end of 2021 there were no employees off work on work-related ACC.
2.3.2 Public incidents
There were 15 incidents involving members of the public during October and December 2021.
Most incidents occur in the aquatic facilities.
2.3.2a Public injuries
During the reporting period, there were eleven injuries to members of the public.
Reporting period |
Non-treatment injury |
FAI |
MTI |
Fatality |
Total recordable injuries |
July-Sept 21 |
2 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
Oct-Dec 21 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
2.4 Critical risk
The number of incident reports made relating to critical risk has been included in this report. This is the first presentation of this data.
All incident reports relating to critical risk in 2021 were proactive reports (observations, exposure events, near misses or reports of unsafe behaviour).
For example, biological hazards had 20 related reports in 2021. These incidents include minor bleeding and faecal matter in the pool (commonly referred to a code brown). These incidents would be considered exposure events.
Critical risk
|
Existing controls |
New or upcoming controls |
Related incident reports |
Driving |
· Vehicle User Policy · E-Roads installed in fleet vehicles · 5-Star ANCAP rated vehicles · Licenced drivers · Fleet inductions for new starters · Chain fitting training |
· Adverse Weather Guidelines were updated |
2 |
Remote or isolated working |
· Working from Home Policy · Panic buttons · Work planning · Buddy systems · Risk assessments |
· Planned procurement of Lone Worker software in Q4 2021-22 · Employees working from home are required to complete a risk assessment for their work space every 6 months (or as things change) · Panic button installed at Ranfurly Pool · Trespass procedures reviewed |
0 |
Psychosocial hazards
|
· Employee Assistance Programme (EAP) · Wellbeing programme · Regular 1:1s · Flexible working · Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO), Discrimination, Harassment and Bullying Policy · Performance Management Policy · Fit for Work Programme |
· De-escalation training completed by Environmental Engineering · Referrals to EAP by People and Culture: 30 (to end of Q3) · EAP take up rate: · 32 individual users (Q2), · 30 individual users (Q3) |
15 |
Biological hazards
|
· High-risk vaccinations programme · Engineering controls · PPE is provided |
· Covid-19 Vaccination Policy adopted · Health and safety made site visits to all wastewater treatment facilities in district |
20 |
Hazardous chemicals
|
· Chemical register · Display safety data sheets · Appropriate storage · Quantities stored is kept at a minimum · Ventilation and circulation of air is monitored · PPE is provided for handling or working with chemicals · Records of training are maintained · Fire schemes updated with FENZ (chemical registers) · Qualified contractors |
· Wastewater treatment site visits
|
6 |
2.6 Training and initiatives
The following regular training was completed:
Training |
This period |
YTD |
New staff inductions |
9 |
35 |
First aid certificates |
0 |
41 |
SiteSafe passports |
5 |
13 |
Fire safety warden |
14 |
25 |
Initiatives planned:
· Working from home wellbeing focus for all teams as they move into a new phase of working
· Move it March will return for 2022
· Internal values implementation team have proposed a programme for 2022
Nil
Report author: |
Reviewed and authorised by: |
|
|
Rachel Ennis |
Louise Fleck |
Health, Safety and Wellbeing Officer |
Executive Manager - People and Culture |
14/02/2022 |
14/02/2022
|
|
22.1.10 February 2022 Chair's Report
Doc ID: 567395
1. Purpose
To consider the February Chair’s report.
That the report be received.
|
Nil
|
22.1.11 February Members' Reports
Doc ID: 567394
1. Purpose
To consider the February members’ reports.
That the reports be received.
|
Nil
|
22.1.12 February Governance Report
Doc ID: 567392
1. Purpose
To report on items of general interest, consider the Audit and Risk Committee’s forward work programme and the current status report updates.
That the report be received.
|
2. Discussion
Forward Work Programme
The Audit and Risk Committee’s forward work programme has been included for information.
Status Report
The status report has been updated with actions undertaken since the last meeting.
Appendix 1 - Forward Work Programme ⇩
Appendix 2 - Status Report Update ⇩
Report author: |
Reviewed and authorised by: |
|
|
Rebecca Williams |
Sanchia Jacobs |
Governance Manager |
Chief Executive Officer |
14/02/2022 |
18/02/2022
|
25 February 2022 |
The date of the next scheduled meeting is 3 June 2022.
25 February 2022 |
10 Resolution to Exclude the Public
That the public be excluded from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting. The general subject matter of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under section 48 of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution are as follows:
|